Rokinon Cine DS16M-C 16mm

Rokinon Cine DS16M-C 16mm

Rokinon
48 종합 점수
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 종합 점수

점수

Budget
Rokinon
40
Canon
97
Portrait
Rokinon
34
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Rokinon
45
Canon
90
Street
Rokinon
39
Canon
82
Travel
Rokinon
30
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Rokinon
36
Canon
77
Landscape
Rokinon
45
Canon
76
Professional
Rokinon
45
Canon
75
Macro
Rokinon
64
Canon
68

사양

Rokinon Cine DS16M-C 16mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm135 mm
Elements1316
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements21
ED Elements11
CoatingUltra Multi-CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max ApertureT22f/3.5
Min ApertureT2.23.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades87
Build
MountCanon EF-SCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.59 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm390 mm
Max Magnification0.28x

장단점

Rokinon Cine DS16M-C 16mm

  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

가격

Both products are similarly priced.

Rokinon Cine DS16M-C 16mm0.090달러당 점수
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM0.175달러당 점수

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM 1.9배 더 나은 가성비

Rokinon Cine DS16M-C 16mm

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

결론

승자: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

이것도 고려해보세요