KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 50mm
KIPON
45 종합 점수
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 종합 점수
점수
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
사양
| KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 50mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | — | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | L-Mount |
| Format | Full-Frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.50 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
장단점
KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 50mm
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
가격
KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 50mm0.030달러당 점수
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.056달러당 점수
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm 1.9배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
