JBL Vibe Flex Vibe Flex 2
JBL
25 종합 점수
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro
Samsung
97 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Fitness
Commute
Travel
Calls
Gaming
Music
사양
| JBL Vibe Flex Vibe Flex 2 | Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | Large, Small |
| Weight | — | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 12 mm★ | 10.5 mm |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Max | — | 96 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, Samsung Seamless, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, PBP, TMAP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 6 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | Yes★ |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 26 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Capacity | — | 53 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Bixby, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | JBL app | Galaxy Wearable App |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IP57 |
장단점
JBL Vibe Flex Vibe Flex 2
- Below average battery (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average build (33rd percentile)
Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
가격
JBL Vibe Flex Vibe Flex 20.496달러당 점수
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro0.288달러당 점수
JBL Vibe Flex Vibe Flex 2 1.7배 더 나은 가성비
JBL Vibe Flex Vibe Flex 2
Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro
결론
승자: Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro
Scores 97 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 37 specs.
