Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
82 総合スコア
vs
QCY H3 PRO
QCY
81 総合スコア
スコア
Budget
Commute
Music
Gaming
Work
Studio
Calls
スペック
| Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | QCY H3 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.22 kg★ | 0.23 kg |
| Ear Cushion | replaceable ear pads | protein leather |
| Headband | aluminum and durable textiles | leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 45 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Profiles | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Range | 15 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 40 hrs | 55 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hrs | 0.17000000178813934 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 15 Hours | 10 min for 5 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | 630 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 3★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Fast Pair | — |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | beyerdynamic app | QCY App |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
長所と短所
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
QCY H3 PRO
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
価格
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.291ドルあたりのスコア
vs
QCY H3 PRO1.159ドルあたりのスコア
QCY H3 PRO 4.0倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 40 specs.
