ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
ASUS
100 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Samsung QBC QB75C-N 75"
Samsung
53 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifiche
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" | Samsung QBC QB75C-N 75" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 75" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 8 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 350 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 72% NTSC |
| Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-Bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 3★ |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 2★ | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓★ | — |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 400x400 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 25W★ | 129W |
| Weight | 6.70 kg★ | — |
Pro e Contro
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Samsung QBC QB75C-N 75"
- Strong display (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong color (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Below average performance (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average portability (25th percentile)
- Below average social proof (34th percentile)
- Below average ergonomic (35th percentile)
Prezzi
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 20240.115punteggio per dollaro
vs
Samsung QBC QB75C-N 75"0.017punteggio per dollaro
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 6.8x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27"
Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 28 specs.
