Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm
Zeiss
32 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Specifiche
| Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 11 | — |
| Groups | 8 | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | — |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | — |
| Format | Full-Frame★ | — |
| Weight | 1.12 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 800 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:4★ | — |
Pro e Contro
Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm
- Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Prezzi
Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No current pricing available
Verdetto
Vincitore: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 14 specs.
