ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
ASUS
96 Score global
vs
Panasonic EQ3 Series TH-86EQ3W
Panasonic
53 Score global
Scores
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spécifications
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" | Panasonic EQ3 Series TH-86EQ3W | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | — |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 8 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits | 500 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 1.07 Billion Colors (8-Bit+FRC) |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | 8-bit (8-bit+FRC) |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 3★ |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 2★ | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 600x400 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 25W★ | 332W |
| Weight | 6.70 kg★ | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Panasonic EQ3 Series TH-86EQ3W
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong color (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong connectivity (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong display (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average performance (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
Prix
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 20240.110score par dollar
vs
Panasonic EQ3 Series TH-86EQ3W0.006score par dollar
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27" Black 2024 offre un rapport qualité-prix 18.3x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 27"
Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 28 specs.
