Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Score global
vs
Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm
Tamron
46 Score global
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Macro
Travel
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Spécifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 250 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/18 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-6.3 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon AF |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | — | 0.42 kg★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:3.5★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm
- Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (78th percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average aperture (34th percentile)
Verdict
Gagnant: Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm
Scores 46 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 11 specs.