Olympus MC-20
Olympus
46 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Score global
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spécifications
| Olympus MC-20 | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 80 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 600 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 13 |
| Groups | 4 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | ZERO Coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Nikon Z |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.15 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Olympus MC-20
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Prix
Olympus MC-200.048score par dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062score par dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.3x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
