OM System M.Zuiko Digital 25mm f/1.8 II 25mm
OM System
46 Score global
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 Score global
Scores
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spécifications
| OM System M.Zuiko Digital 25mm f/1.8 II 25mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 25 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 25 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 16 |
| Groups | 7 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | ZERO coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Fujifilm X |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.16 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | MSC | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:8 | 1:4.8 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
OM System M.Zuiko Digital 25mm f/1.8 II 25mm
- Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong macro (78th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Prix
OM System M.Zuiko Digital 25mm f/1.8 II 25mm0.082score par dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.119score par dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.5x meilleur
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Verdict
Gagnant: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
