Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Score global
vs
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm
Canon
64 Score global
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spécifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 55 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 12 |
| Groups | 11 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 4-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon EF-S |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.21 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55 | 1:4 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong versatility (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Prix
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.076score par dollar
vs
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm0.188score par dollar
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.5x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
