OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro 60mm
OM System
52 Score global
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Score global
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spécifications
| OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro 60mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 60 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 60 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Groups | 10 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 5★ |
| Coating | ZERO (Zuiko Extra-low Reflection Optical) coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Stepping AF Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:1 | 1:5.55 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro 60mm
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong optical (68th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Prix
Verdict
Gagnant: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
