Sony E SEL18200LE 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 OSS LE 18-200mm
Sony
52 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28-400mm
Nikon
75 Score global
Scores
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Budget
Travel
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Spécifications
| Sony E SEL18200LE 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 OSS LE 18-200mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28-400mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 400 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 21 |
| Groups | 13 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 22-40 | 22-45 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | 4-8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.72 kg |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | OSS | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 200 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.27x | 1:2.86★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sony E SEL18200LE 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 OSS LE 18-200mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
- Below average social proof (30th percentile)
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28-400mm
- Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
- Below average bokeh (26th percentile)
Prix
Sony E SEL18200LE 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 OSS LE 18-200mm
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28-400mm
No current pricing available
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28-400mm
Scores 75 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
