Minolta MN50WP-R red 2024
Minolta
40 Score global
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M1 E-M1 Mark III 2018
Olympus
86 Score global
Scores
Beginner
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Video
Photography
Youtube
Product Photography
Streaming
Vlogging
Travel
Spécifications
| Minolta MN50WP-R | Olympus OM-D E-M1 E-M1 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | MOS |
| Size | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 48 MP★ | 20.399999618530273 MP |
| ISO Range | — | 200★ |
| Processor | — | TruePic IX |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | Pas de données | |
| AF Type | — | Phase Detection: 121 (121 Cross-Type)Contrast Detection: 121 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 15 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 60 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 5K | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✗ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✗ |
| Codec | — | H.264/MOV |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.8" | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.14 kg★ | 0.58 kg |
| Battery Life | — | 420 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C (USB 2.0)★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Minolta MN50WP-R red 2024
- Strong video (77th percentile)
- Strong sensor (73rd percentile)
- Strong build (73rd percentile)
- Strong display (72nd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (21st percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Olympus OM-D E-M1 E-M1 Mark III 2018
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
Prix
Verdict
Gagnant: Olympus OM-D E-M1 E-M1 Mark III
Scores 86 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 20 of 33 specs.
