Sony ILX-LR1
Sony
23 Score global
vs
Canon EOS R R3 2022
Canon
84 Score global
Scores
Sports Wildlife
Video
Beginner
Wedding Events
Youtube
Photography
Product Photography
Streaming
Travel
Vlogging
Spécifications
| Sony ILX-LR1 | Canon EOS R R3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | full-frame | full-frame |
| Megapixels | 60 MP★ | 24.100000381469727 MP |
| ISO Range | 100 | 100 |
| Processor | BIONZ XR | DIGIC X |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | Pas de données | |
| AF Type | — | Phase Detection: 1053 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 12 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/64000 |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 6K★ |
| 4K FPS | 60 fps | 120 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps★ | 100 fps |
| 10-bit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Log Profile | ✓ | ✓ |
| RAW Video | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codec | XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I | H.264, H.265, Raw |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3.2"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 5.8M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.24 kg★ | 0.82 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | USB-C 3.0 / 3.1/3.2 Gen 1 | USB-C |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | ✓★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sony ILX-LR1
- Strong video (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong sensor (76th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average display (30th percentile)
Canon EOS R R3 2022
- Strong af (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong video (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong evf (96th percentile)96th %ile
Prix
Sony ILX-LR10.005score par dollar
vs
Canon EOS R R3 20220.013score par dollar
Canon EOS R R3 2022 offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.6x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Canon EOS R R3
Scores 84 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 16 of 32 specs.
