Zeiss Milvus 000000-2096-562 100mm

Zeiss Milvus 000000-2096-562 100mm

Zeiss
35 Puntuación general
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Travel
Zeiss
28
Sony
94
Budget
Zeiss
30
Sony
91
Street
Zeiss
25
Sony
90
Video Cinema
Zeiss
22
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Zeiss
23
Sony
84
Landscape
Zeiss
35
Sony
79
Portrait
Zeiss
23
Sony
77
Professional
Zeiss
29
Sony
77
Macro
Zeiss
51
Sony
68

Especificaciones

Zeiss Milvus 000000-2096-562 100mmSony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min100 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max100 mm50 mm
Elements99
Groups88
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements2★1
CoatingZEISS T* anti-reflective coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/23.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.84 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyAutofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance440 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification1:2★0.215x

Pros y Contras

Zeiss Milvus 000000-2096-562 100mm

  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Precios

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is 1854 CAD cheaper (8.4x less).

Zeiss Milvus 000000-2096-562 100mm0.017puntos por dólar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.354puntos por dólar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS ofrece 20.8x mejor relación calidad-precio

Zeiss Milvus 000000-2096-562 100mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Veredicto

★ Ganador: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

También considerar