Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Ediloca
29 Overall Score
vs
Kingston KC3000 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston KC3000 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
77 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Ediloca
73
Kingston
87
Workstation
Ediloca
28
Kingston
72
Laptop
Ediloca
28
Kingston
66
Console
Ediloca
9
Kingston
61
Gaming
Ediloca
19
Kingston
61
Portable
Ediloca
7
Kingston
19

Specifications

Ediloca ES106Kingston KC3000
Drive
Capacity
256
512
Form Factor2.5"M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—4★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
520
7,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
450
3,900
Random Read (IOPS)No data
450,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
900,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache—✗
Controller—Phison E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)No data
400
MTBF (hours)No data
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✗✓★

Pros & Cons

Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong affordability (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average speed (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

Kingston KC3000 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong random (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (34th percentile)

Pricing

Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5" is CA$175 cheaper (3.7x less).

Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5"0.449score per dollar
vs
Kingston KC3000 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.321score per dollar

Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5" offers 1.4x better value for money

Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Kingston KC3000 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Verdict

★ Winner: Kingston KC3000

Scores 77 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 17 specs.

Kingston KC3000 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Also Consider