Kingston 1TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston 1TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
89 Overall Score
vs
Silicon Power A55 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Silicon Power A55 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Silicon Power
23 Overall Score

Scores

Laptop
Kingston
91
Silicon Power
24
Workstation
Kingston
90
Silicon Power
18
Gaming
Kingston
87
Silicon Power
14
Console
Kingston
82
Silicon Power
7
Budget
Kingston
81
Silicon Power
64
Portable
Kingston
23
Silicon Power
5

Specifications

Kingston 1TB SSDSilicon Power A55
Drive
Capacity
1,000
256
Form FactorM.2 22802.5"
InterfacePCIe 5.0SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,200
No data
Sequential Write (MB/s)
11,000
No data
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
No data
Random Write (IOPS)
2,200,000
No data
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✓★✗
ControllerSilicon Motion SM2508—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
1,000
No data
Warranty (years)3★—
Features
Heatsink✗✗

Pros & Cons

Kingston 1TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong endurance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong feature (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average affordability (25th percentile)

Silicon Power A55 256GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong affordability (78th percentile)
  • Below average speed (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

Pricing

Silicon Power A55 256GB SATA III 2.5" is CA$398 cheaper (4.5x less).

Kingston 1TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 22800.173score per dollar
vs
Silicon Power A55 256GB SATA III 2.5"0.201score per dollar

Silicon Power A55 256GB SATA III 2.5" offers 1.2x better value for money

Kingston 1TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Silicon Power A55 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Verdict

★ Winner: Kingston 1TB SSD

Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 16 specs.

Kingston 1TB SSD Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Also Consider