Ediloca EN206 256GB SATA III M.2 2280

Ediloca EN206 256GB SATA III M.2 2280

Ediloca
37 Overall Score
vs
XPG Mars 980 Blade

XPG Mars 980 Blade

XPG
82 Overall Score

Scores

Workstation
Ediloca
37
XPG
84
Laptop
Ediloca
39
XPG
83
Gaming
Ediloca
23
XPG
80
Console
Ediloca
11
XPG
75
Budget
Ediloca
39
XPG
71
Portable
Ediloca
9
XPG
20

Specifications

Ediloca EN206XPG Mars 980 Blade
Drive
Capacity
256
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation35★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
550
14,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
460
12,000
Random Read (IOPS)No data
2,000,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,650,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache—✓★
Controller—SMI SM2508
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
100
740
MTBF (hours)
1,000,000
No data
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink—✗
Hardware Encryption—✓★

Pros & Cons

Ediloca EN206 256GB SATA III M.2 2280

  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Strong endurance (71st percentile)
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average speed (23rd percentile)

XPG Mars 980 Blade

  • Strong random (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong speed (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong endurance (90th percentile)90th %ile

Pricing

Ediloca EN206 256GB SATA III M.2 2280

XPG Mars 980 Blade

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: XPG Mars 980 Blade

Scores 82 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

XPG Mars 980 Blade Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Also Consider