Kingston KC600 512GB SATA III mSATA

Kingston KC600 512GB SATA III mSATA

Kingston
51 Overall Score
vs
Crucial T500 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial T500 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial
96 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Kingston KC600 512GB SATA III mSATA

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

Users are generally satisfied with this drive, praising its speed and value for money. One reviewer noted that while it works well, the speed is limited by USB 2.0 enclosures, but with USB 3.0 it performs much better. Another used it successfully as a ZIL/SLOG drive in a large RAID array, highlighting its compact size and performance.

Pros
  • Fast performance
  • Good value for money
  • Compact size
  • Works well as ZIL/SLOG drive
Cons
  • Speed limited by USB 2.0
  • Not compatible with Surface Pro 7
👍 Performance 2
👍 Value for money 1
🤔 Compatibility 2
🤔 Usb speed 1
👍 Size 1

Crucial T500 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

88 out of 100 medium confidence 15 reviews

The Crucial T500 2TB SSD is highly praised for its fast performance and good value, with users noting it rivals more expensive drives. Installation is straightforward, though some mention the lack of a screw and potential fit issues with heatsinks in compact devices. A few users experienced minor software glitches after cloning, but overall satisfaction remains high.

Pros
  • Fast read/write speeds
  • Good value for money
  • Easy installation
  • Reliable brand
  • Large storage capacity
Cons
  • No screw included
  • Potential fit issues with heatsinks
  • Software glitches after cloning
👍 Performance 5
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Installation 4
👍 Reliability 2
👍 Compatibility 2
👎 Accessories 2

Scores

Gaming
Kingston
34
Crucial
93
Workstation
Kingston
47
Crucial
93
Console
Kingston
17
Crucial
92
Budget
Kingston
77
Crucial
86
Laptop
Kingston
50
Crucial
82
Portable
Kingston
13
Crucial
25

Specifications

Kingston KC600Crucial T500
Drive
Capacity
512
2,000
Form FactormSATAM.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—4★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
550
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
520
7,000
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,180,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,440,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✓✓
ControllerSM2259Phison E25
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)No data
1,200
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink—✓★
Hardware Encryption✓✓

Pros & Cons

Kingston KC600 512GB SATA III mSATA

  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average speed (34th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (35th percentile)

Crucial T500 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong speed (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Below average affordability (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

Kingston KC600 512GB SATA III mSATA is CA$763 cheaper (3.6x less).

Kingston KC600 512GB SATA III mSATA0.171score per dollar
vs
Crucial T500 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.091score per dollar

Kingston KC600 512GB SATA III mSATA offers 1.9x better value for money

Kingston KC600 512GB SATA III mSATA

Crucial T500 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Verdict

★ Winner: Crucial T500

Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.

Crucial T500 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Also Consider