G.Skill Ripjaws V
G.Skill
55 Overall Score
vs
Crucial Pro Overclocking
Crucial
91 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
G.Skill Ripjaws V
No customer feedback yet
Crucial Pro Overclocking
88 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews
This Crucial DDR5-6400 kit is widely praised for its stability and solid performance, especially in memory-bound tasks. Users appreciate the easy XMP/EXPO setup and reliable operation, though some note the price is high due to market conditions and that overclocking headroom is limited without aggressive cooling. Overall, it's seen as a dependable mid-to-high-end choice for compatible systems.
Pros
- Stable at rated speeds
- Easy XMP/EXPO setup
- Solid build quality
- Good performance uplift
- Reliable brand reputation
Cons
- High price due to market
- Limited overclocking headroom
- Average timings
- White color may not suit all
Stability 6
Performance 5
Value for money 4
Overclocking 4
Build quality 3
Ease of setup 3
Scores
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| G.Skill Ripjaws V | Crucial Pro Overclocking | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 4★ | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 19★ | 32 |
| Timings | 19-19-19-43 | 32-40-40-103 |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
G.Skill Ripjaws V
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
Crucial Pro Overclocking
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (78th percentile)
Pricing
G.Skill Ripjaws V0.115score per dollar
vs
Crucial Pro Overclocking0.086score per dollar
G.Skill Ripjaws V offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Crucial Pro Overclocking
Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 3 of 15 specs.
