Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Titanium Silverblue 256GB
Apple iPhone 17 White 256GB
Scores
Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Apple iPhone 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.9 | 6.3 |
| Display Type | Dynamic AMOLED★ | Super Retina XDR |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 | 2622 x 1206 |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness | 2600 nits | 3000 nits★ |
| HDR | ✓ | ✓ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Apple A19 |
| Processor Model | Snapdragon | A19 |
| CPU Cores | 8★ | 6 |
| CPU Speed | 3.50★ | — |
| RAM | 12 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0★ | — |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 200 MP★ | 48 MP |
| Camera Count | 4★ | 2 |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP★ | 48 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP★ | 12 MP |
| Front Camera | 12 MP | 18 MP★ |
| Optical Zoom | 5x★ | 2x |
| Video | 8K@30fps★ | 4K@60fps |
| OIS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 5,000 mAh★ | 3,692 mAh |
| Wired Charging | 45W★ | 30W |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fast Charging | Super Fast | MagSafe |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 6 |
| NFC | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB | USB-C 3.2★ | USB-C |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | eSIM |
| eSIM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | — | 0.18 kg★ |
| Fingerprint | in-display | — |
| Face Recognition | ✓ | ✓ |
| OS | Android | iOS |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stereo Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Titanium Silverblue 256GB
- Strong camera (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (96th percentile)96th %ile
Apple iPhone 17 White 256GB
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (94th percentile)94th %ile
Pricing
Apple iPhone 17 White 256GB offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Scores 89 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 15 of 42 specs.