MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

MSI
96 Overall Score
vs
KTC H32S17C 32"

KTC H32S17C 32"

KTC
68 Overall Score

Scores

Office
MSI
87
KTC
62
Professional
MSI
85
KTC
49
Gaming
MSI
85
KTC
67
Creative
MSI
84
KTC
50
Entertainment
MSI
76
KTC
62
Portable
MSI
14
KTC
6

Specifications

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"KTC H32S17C 32"
Display
Size27"32"
Resolution2560 x 14401920 x 1080
Panel TypeQD-OLEDVA
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Curvature1,500
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz165 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms1 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium ProFreeSync Premium
Color & HDR
Brightness1000 nits350 nits
Color Gamut99% DCI-P3122% sRGB
Color Depth10-bit8 Bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400HDR
HDR SupportHDRHDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C1
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Weight8.00 kg8.35 kg

Pros & Cons

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile

KTC H32S17C 32"

  • Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong performance (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong color (76th percentile)
  • Below average portability (4th percentile)4th %ile

Pricing

KTC H32S17C 32" is CA$570 cheaper (3.1x less).

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.114score per dollar
vs
KTC H32S17C 32"0.250score per dollar

KTC H32S17C 32" offers 2.2x better value for money

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

KTC H32S17C 32"

Verdict

Winner: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"

Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 28 specs.

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" Better at:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

Also Consider