Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Tamron
93 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm
Fujifilm
71 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 | Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 75 mm | 55 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 16 |
| Groups | 15 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| Coating | Fluorine Coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | VXD | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 180 mm★ | 300 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:2.7★ | 0.2x |
Pros & Cons
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
- Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (35th percentile)
Pricing
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G20.080score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm0.044score per dollar
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 offers 1.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Scores 93 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
