Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Meike 85mm F1.8 SE II 85mm

Meike 85mm F1.8 SE II 85mm

Meike
36 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Meike 85mm F1.8 SE II 85mm

72 out of 100 high confidence 39 reviews

The Meike 85mm f/1.8 lens receives mixed feedback. Many users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and value for the price, especially for portrait and low-light photography. However, a significant number of reviewers report issues with autofocus noise, inconsistent autofocus performance, and even complete focus motor failure. Build quality concerns, such as a loose focus ring, are also mentioned, leading to a polarized sentiment where the lens is either loved for its image quality or criticized for reliability.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Great bokeh
  • Excellent value for money
  • Good for low-light photography
  • Lightweight and compact
Cons
  • Loud autofocus noise
  • Inconsistent autofocus performance
  • Focus motor failure reported
  • Loose focus ring on some units
  • Compatibility issues with some adapters
👍 Image quality 12
👎 Autofocus noise 6
🤔 Autofocus performance 8
👎 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Low light performance 4

Scores

Budget
Tamron
96
Meike
41
Macro
Tamron
91
Meike
39
Landscape
Tamron
90
Meike
35
Portrait
Tamron
85
Meike
47
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
85
Meike
44
Professional
Tamron
84
Meike
46
Travel
Tamron
81
Meike
27
Video Cinema
Tamron
81
Meike
52
Street
Tamron
81
Meike
43

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXDMeike 85mm F1.8 SE II 85mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min28 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm85 mm
Elements2011
Groups137
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements2★—
Coatingfluorine coatingmulti-coated on both sides, fingerprint- and oil-resistant coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountSony ENikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.59 kg★—
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motor★STM
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★650 mm
Max Magnification1:2.8★0.17X

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Meike 85mm F1.8 SE II 85mm

  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (31st percentile)
  • Below average build (31st percentile)

Pricing

Meike 85mm F1.8 SE II 85mm is CA$618 cheaper (2.9x less).

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Meike 85mm F1.8 SE II 85mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider