Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR
Fujifilm
72 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
90 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 8 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 19 | 16 |
| Groups | 14 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 6★ | 2 |
| Coating | Nano-GI (Gradient Index) coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 1.25 kg | 0.33 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 88 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Linear motor | Linear motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 450 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.1x | 0.29x★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR0.036score per dollar
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.115score per dollar
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 3.2x better value for money
Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Verdict
Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 90 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.
