Leica Tri Elmar-M 11626 16mm

Leica Tri Elmar-M 11626 16mm

Leica
21 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Leica
26
Sony
100
Street
Leica
17
Sony
89
Travel
Leica
25
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Leica
14
Sony
84
Portrait
Leica
16
Sony
83
Video Cinema
Leica
16
Sony
83
Professional
Leica
14
Sony
73
Landscape
Leica
16
Sony
73
Macro
Leica
9
Sony
68

Specifications

Leica Tri Elmar-M 11626 16mmSony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max21 mm135 mm
Elements416
Groups412
Aspherical Elements2★1
ED Elements—2★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades10★7
Build
MountLeica MSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weight0.48 kg0.33 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyLinear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm450 mm★
Max Magnification0.06250.29x★

Pros & Cons

Leica Tri Elmar-M 11626 16mm

  • Strong versatility (67th percentile)
  • Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average macro (29th percentile)

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Pricing

Leica Tri Elmar-M 11626 16mm

No current pricing available

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider