Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm

Sony
75 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

Viltrox
62 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm

No customer feedback yet

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

82 out of 100 medium confidence 15 reviews

The Viltrox 20mm f/2.8 lens is widely praised for its exceptional value, sharp optics, and lightweight build, making it a favorite for landscape, video, and everyday photography. However, many users report inconsistent autofocus performance, with some experiencing hunting or inaccuracy even after firmware updates. The lens hood is noted as a minor weak point, and the lack of an AF/MF switch on the lens body can be confusing. Overall, it delivers impressive image quality for its price, but autofocus reliability remains a key concern.

Pros
  • Exceptional value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Lightweight and compact
  • Solid metal build
  • Good color and contrast
Cons
  • Inconsistent autofocus performance
  • Autofocus hunting in AF-C mode
  • Lens hood does not lock tightly
  • No AF/MF switch on lens body
  • Focus ring has no hard stop in manual mode
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Image quality 10
👎 Autofocus performance 7
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Weight and portability 5
👎 Lens hood 2

Scores

Landscape
Sony
90
Viltrox
63
Professional
Sony
80
Viltrox
70
Travel
Sony
79
Viltrox
48
Wildlife Sports
Sony
79
Viltrox
65
Budget
Sony
79
Viltrox
63
Video Cinema
Sony
76
Viltrox
63
Street
Sony
69
Viltrox
61
Macro
Sony
66
Viltrox
59
Portrait
Sony
54
Viltrox
63

Specifications

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mmViltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm75 mm
Elements1316
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements5★2
ED Elements23★
CoatingFluorine CoatingHD Nano Multi-layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/16
Min Aperturef/4f/1.2
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades711★
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.35 kg★0.67 kg
Filter Thread72 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeXD Linear Motors★STM
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance240 mm★880 mm
Max Magnification0.19x1:10★

Pros & Cons

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm is CA$655 cheaper (2.0x less).

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm0.058score per dollar
vs
Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm0.097score per dollar

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm offers 1.7x better value for money

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm

Scores 75 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm Better at:

Portrait

Also Consider