TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm

TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm

TTArtisan
41 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
91 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
TTArtisan
38
Tamron
88
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
30
Tamron
86
Professional
TTArtisan
31
Tamron
84
Macro
TTArtisan
44
Tamron
84
Portrait
TTArtisan
37
Tamron
82
Street
TTArtisan
37
Tamron
75
Landscape
TTArtisan
31
Tamron
73
Travel
TTArtisan
30
Tamron
68
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
25
Tamron
65

Specifications

TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mmTamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min50 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm75 mm
Elements617
Groups515
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements12★
Coatingmulti-layer coatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/16f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades10★9
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.33 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread43 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeManual FocusVXD
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm180 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2.7★

Pros & Cons

TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm

  • Strong build (72nd percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile

Pricing

TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm is CA$1,018 cheaper (7.8x less).

TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm0.271score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G20.078score per dollar

TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm offers 3.5x better value for money

TTArtisan 50mm f/2 50mm

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider