Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Leica Summicron-SL 35mm f/2 ASPH 35mm
Leica
69 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Budget
Street
Macro
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Leica Summicron-SL 35mm f/2 ASPH 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 11 |
| Groups | 11 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 3 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | Hydrophobic Aqua-Dura coating on external lenses |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.40 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 240 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26 | 1:6.67 |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Leica Summicron-SL 35mm f/2 ASPH 35mm
- Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong macro (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.060score per dollar
vs
Leica Summicron-SL 35mm f/2 ASPH 35mm0.019score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 3.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.
