Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm GF 80mm f/1.7 R WR 80mm

Fujifilm GF 80mm f/1.7 R WR 80mm

Fujifilm
39 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Fujifilm GF 80mm f/1.7 R WR 80mm

82 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Fujifilm GF 63mm f/2.8 R WR lens is highly praised for its stunning image quality, sharpness, and beautiful bokeh, making it a favorite for portrait and general photography on the GFX system. Many verified buyers call it a "keeper" and note its excellent build and value for money. However, several users report that autofocus can be slow, especially in low light, and the focus motor is noisy. While most find the AF acceptable for the system, a few reviewers returned the lens due to speed concerns. Overall, sentiment is strongly positive with a notable caveat about autofocus performance.

Pros
  • Stunning image quality and sharpness
  • Beautiful bokeh and subject isolation
  • Excellent build quality
  • Great value for money in medium format
  • Compact and lightweight for GFX system
Cons
  • Autofocus can be slow in low light
  • Noisy focus motor
  • AF speed too slow for some users
  • Not a true 1:1 macro lens
  • Some units arrived with damaged packaging
👍 Image quality 8
🤔 Autofocus speed 7
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Bokeh 3
👎 Autofocus noise 2

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
48
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
40
Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
39
Macro
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
39
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
34
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
46
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
42
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
40
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
34

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm GF 80mm f/1.7 R WR 80mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm80 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm80 mm
Elements1312
Groups119
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.7
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm G
Formatfull-frame★medium-format
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.80 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Auto Focus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★700 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.15x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm GF 80mm f/1.7 R WR 80mm

  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (73rd percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is CA$1,437 cheaper (2.0x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.060score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm GF 80mm f/1.7 R WR 80mm0.013score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 4.6x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Fujifilm GF 80mm f/1.7 R WR 80mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider