Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
86 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

Rokinon
59 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

78 out of 100 high confidence 30 reviews

The Rokinon 50mm f/1.4 lens receives generally positive feedback for its excellent value, sharp optics, and solid build quality, especially for astrophotography and low-light use. However, many users note that the autofocus can be inconsistent and unreliable for fast-moving subjects, and some copies have decentering issues. The lens is fully manual on certain mounts, which is a key consideration for buyers.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Sharp optics for the price
  • Solid all-metal build quality
  • Great for astrophotography
  • Good low-light performance at f/1.4
Cons
  • Inconsistent autofocus performance
  • Autofocus unreliable for fast-moving subjects
  • Some copies have decentering issues
  • Soft corners at f/1.4
  • Fully manual on certain mounts
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Build quality 6
👎 Autofocus performance 7
👍 Astrophotography suitability 5
👍 Low light performance 4

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Rokinon
68
Portrait
Nikon
87
Rokinon
79
Macro
Nikon
84
Rokinon
60
Budget
Nikon
83
Rokinon
60
Street
Nikon
83
Rokinon
63
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Rokinon
63
Landscape
Nikon
81
Rokinon
50
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Rokinon
44
Travel
Nikon
70
Rokinon
48

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mmRokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm50 mm
Elements139
Groups116
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-CoatedUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★8
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.42 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:6.25

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

  • Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Pricing

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm is CA$1,087 cheaper (3.6x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.057score per dollar
vs
Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm0.139score per dollar

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm offers 2.4x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 50mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider