Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR 23mm

Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR 23mm

Fujifilm
49 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
56
Macro
Nikon
88
Fujifilm
44
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
51
Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
59
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
45
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
51
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
45
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
48
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
55

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR 23mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm23 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm23 mm
Elements138
Groups116
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★0
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades911★
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.09 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm39 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★200 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.15x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR 23mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR 23mm is CA$953 cheaper (2.7x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.060score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR 23mm0.088score per dollar

Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR 23mm offers 1.5x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2.8 R WR 23mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider