Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
61 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Tamron Di III 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

78 out of 100 high confidence 42 reviews

The Tamron 150-500mm lens is widely praised for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent value compared to native telephoto zooms. Many users appreciate the extra reach and image quality, though the weight is a common concern, especially for handheld use. Some reviewers note trade-offs in low-light performance and stabilization, and a few report compatibility issues with teleconverters or defective copies.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Great value for money
  • Extra reach over 100-400mm
  • Effective image stabilization (VC)
Cons
  • Heavy for handheld use
  • Average low-light performance
  • Stabilization not as good as native lenses
  • No teleconverter compatibility
  • Some copies may be defective
👍 Sharpness 12
👍 Autofocus speed 8
👍 Value for money 10
👎 Weight 14
🤔 Image stabilization 7
👎 Low light performance 5

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Tamron
62
Portrait
Nikon
87
Tamron
65
Budget
Nikon
84
Tamron
67
Macro
Nikon
84
Tamron
65
Street
Nikon
83
Tamron
58
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Tamron
60
Landscape
Nikon
82
Tamron
71
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Tamron
63
Travel
Nikon
70
Tamron
57

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mmTamron Di III 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typezoomsuper-telephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm150 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm500 mm
Elements1325
Groups1116
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements35★
CoatingMulti-CoatedBBAR-G2 and fluorine coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/5
Min Aperturef/2.85-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★1.73 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★VXD linear autofocus motor
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★600 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:3.1

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Tamron Di III 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.060score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD0.042score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm offers 1.4x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Tamron Di III 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider