Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon 100M-E 100mm

Rokinon 100M-E 100mm

Rokinon
37 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Rokinon
34
Macro
Nikon
88
Rokinon
53
Budget
Nikon
85
Rokinon
35
Street
Nikon
84
Rokinon
31
Portrait
Nikon
84
Rokinon
22
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Rokinon
32
Landscape
Nikon
79
Rokinon
33
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Rokinon
28
Travel
Nikon
70
Rokinon
25

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Rokinon 100M-E 100mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm100 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm100 mm
Elements1315
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-CoatedUltra Multi-Coating (UMC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/32
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★0.73 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★305 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:1

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Rokinon 100M-E 100mm

  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Strong macro (69th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Rokinon 100M-E 100mm is CA$817 cheaper (2.2x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Rokinon 100M-E 100mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider