Sigma 583110

Sigma 583110

Sigma
67 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm

Nikon
94 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
61
Nikon
95
Portrait
Sigma
44
Nikon
90
Street
Sigma
52
Nikon
87
Budget
Sigma
67
Nikon
87
Macro
Sigma
75
Nikon
85
Video Cinema
Sigma
61
Nikon
83
Landscape
Sigma
67
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
55
Nikon
78
Travel
Sigma
58
Nikon
74

Specifications

Sigma 583110Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm28 mm
Elements1713
Groups1311
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements23
Coatingsuper multi-layer coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountNikon FNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.56 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:51:5.26

Pros & Cons

Sigma 583110

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average aperture (23rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Sigma 5831100.047score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm0.062score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm offers 1.3x better value for money

Sigma 583110

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm

Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 17-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider