Viltrox EVO AF 75mm F1.8 EVO 75mm
Viltrox
52 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Viltrox EVO AF 75mm F1.8 EVO 75mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 75 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 75 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 13 |
| Groups | 9 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | water and smudge-resistant coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.33 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 740 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.12x | 1:5.26★ |
Pros & Cons
Viltrox EVO AF 75mm F1.8 EVO 75mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average macro (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Viltrox EVO AF 75mm F1.8 EVO 75mm0.108score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.060score per dollar
Viltrox EVO AF 75mm F1.8 EVO 75mm offers 1.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
