Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
68 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Canon
58
Nikon
89
Macro
Canon
86
Nikon
88
Budget
Canon
65
Nikon
85
Street
Canon
67
Nikon
84
Portrait
Canon
35
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Canon
58
Nikon
82
Landscape
Canon
71
Nikon
79
Travel
Canon
78
Nikon
70
Wildlife Sports
Canon
67
Nikon
73

Specifications

Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USMNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min15 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm28 mm
Elements1713
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements13★
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/36f/2.8
Min Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.08 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance85 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong macro (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average aperture (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

Travel

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

BudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider