Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox
69 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 20 reviews

The Viltrox 27mm F/1.2 Pro lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its exceptional sharpness, beautiful bokeh, and solid build quality with weather sealing. Users praise its low-light performance and color rendition, though some note the autofocus can lag slightly with moving subjects and the lens is quite heavy. Overall, it is considered a fantastic value that rivals more expensive options.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness even at f/1.2
  • Beautiful bokeh and subject isolation
  • Solid build with weather sealing
  • Great low-light performance
  • Superb color rendition and contrast
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky design
  • Autofocus lag with moving subjects
  • Large size may feel unbalanced on small bodies
  • Crop sensor lens only (not for full frame)
👍 Image quality 10
👍 Build quality 8
🤔 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Low light performance 5
👍 Value for money 5
👎 Weight and size 5

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Portrait
Viltrox
67
Nikon
89
Professional
Viltrox
69
Nikon
89
Macro
Viltrox
54
Nikon
84
Budget
Viltrox
65
Nikon
83
Street
Viltrox
60
Nikon
82
Video Cinema
Viltrox
71
Nikon
82
Landscape
Viltrox
62
Nikon
78
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
59
Nikon
72
Travel
Viltrox
49
Nikon
70

Specifications

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min27 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max27 mm28 mm
Elements1513
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements23★
CoatingHD Nano multilayer coating with water-resistant and antifouling coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.2f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.56 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.15x1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm is CA$875 cheaper (2.4x less).

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm0.108score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.060score per dollar

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm offers 1.8x better value for money

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider