Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Fotasy Nikkor

Fotasy Nikkor

Fotasy
60 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Fotasy
48
Budget
Sony
91
Fotasy
53
Street
Sony
90
Fotasy
61
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Fotasy
52
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Fotasy
47
Landscape
Sony
79
Fotasy
36
Portrait
Sony
77
Fotasy
54
Professional
Sony
77
Fotasy
46
Macro
Sony
68
Fotasy
63

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSFotasy Nikkor
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min16 mm—
Focal Length Max50 mm—
Elements9—
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5—
Min Aperture3.5-5.6—
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-C★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.11 kg
Filter Thread41 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm229 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x★—

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Fotasy Nikkor

  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong social proof (69th percentile)
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Fotasy Nikkor is CA$204 cheaper (5.4x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.354score per dollar
vs
Fotasy Nikkor1.307score per dollar

Fotasy Nikkor offers 3.7x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Fotasy Nikkor

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider