Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 Z 28mm

Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 Z 28mm

Viltrox
63 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 Z 28mm

72 out of 100 medium confidence 20 reviews

The Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 pancake lens is widely praised for its ultra-compact size, lightweight design, and excellent value, making it a favorite for street photography and travel. Users note it turns a full-frame camera into a highly portable setup, though the fixed f/4.5 aperture and lack of manual focus ring are limiting for some. Image quality is considered good for the price, but low-light performance and autofocus in dim conditions are common drawbacks. A few users reported a stuck rear lens cap or battery drain on certain Sony models, but overall sentiment is positive for its intended casual use.

Pros
  • Ultra-compact and lightweight design
  • Excellent value for the price
  • Great for street photography and travel
  • Sharp image quality for its class
  • Built-in lens cover
Cons
  • Fixed f/4.5 aperture
  • No manual focus ring
  • Poor low-light autofocus
  • Battery drain on Sony A5100
  • Stuck rear lens cap issue
👍 Portability 12
👍 Value for money 10
🤔 Image quality 8
👎 Fixed aperture 5
🤔 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Low light performance 4

Scores

Travel
Sony
99
Viltrox
66
Street
Sony
90
Viltrox
71
Budget
Sony
86
Viltrox
62
Video Cinema
Sony
84
Viltrox
61
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Viltrox
54
Portrait
Sony
83
Viltrox
63
Landscape
Sony
79
Viltrox
60
Professional
Sony
78
Viltrox
68
Macro
Sony
66
Viltrox
62

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSViltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 Z 28mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm28 mm
Elements96
Groups86
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements12★
Coating—multilayer nanocoating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/4.5
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades7★6
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg0.06 kg★
Filter Thread41 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:10★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 Z 28mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 Z 28mm is CA$105 cheaper (1.7x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.358score per dollar
vs
Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 Z 28mm0.431score per dollar

Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 Z 28mm offers 1.2x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 Z 28mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider