Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm
Zeiss
35 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 19 |
| Groups | 11 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| ED Elements | 9★ | 1 |
| Coating | ZEISS T* anti-reflective coating | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.4 | 4-6.3 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.34 kg | 0.57 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 86 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Manual Focus | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.00 m | 500 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:8.6★ | 0.28x |
Pros & Cons
Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average build (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Pricing
Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm0.005score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.070score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR offers 14.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
