Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mm

Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mm

Canon
79 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mm

78 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

The Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM lens is highly praised for its sharpness, fast focusing, and constant f/2.8 aperture, making it a versatile choice for low-light and everyday photography on crop-sensor cameras. Users appreciate its optical quality, often comparing it to Canon's L-series lenses, though some note the lack of weather sealing as a drawback, with a few reporting dust or sand issues. Overall, it is considered a reliable workhorse lens, especially for indoor and event photography.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Constant f/2.8 aperture
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Versatile zoom range
Cons
  • No weather sealing
  • Dust and sand ingress issues
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Large size compared to mirrorless lenses
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 4
👍 Aperture and low light 5
🤔 Build quality and sealing 4
🤔 Compatibility 5
👍 Versatility 4

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Portrait
Canon
91
Nikon
89
Video Cinema
Canon
91
Nikon
82
Budget
Canon
89
Nikon
83
Professional
Canon
82
Nikon
89
Macro
Canon
68
Nikon
84
Street
Canon
80
Nikon
83
Landscape
Canon
68
Nikon
78
Travel
Canon
64
Nikon
73
Wildlife Sports
Canon
72
Nikon
72

Specifications

Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm28 mm
Elements1913
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements23★
CoatingSuper SpectraMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.65 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops3 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.17x1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mm

  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mm is CA$423 cheaper (1.4x less).

Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mm0.072score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm0.059score per dollar

Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mm offers 1.2x better value for money

Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S17-55IS 55mm Better at:

BudgetPortraitVideo Cinema

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroStreetTravelLandscapeProfessional

Also Consider