Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 12mm

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 12mm

Olympus
49 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma
96 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 12mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

This compact wide-angle lens is praised for its sharpness, especially in astrophotography and low-light conditions. Users love its small size and metal build, though some note a rough mounting mechanism. Overall, it delivers excellent image quality for its class.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Great for astrophotography
  • Metal build quality
  • Good micro contrast
Cons
  • Rough mounting mechanism
  • Not a daily lens for everyone
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Size and portability 4
👍 Astrophotography performance 2
👎 Mounting mechanism 1
👍 Value for money 1

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

95 out of 100 high confidence 36 reviews

The Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC DN Art lens is overwhelmingly praised for its exceptional image quality, fast constant aperture, and compact internal zoom design. Users highlight its sharpness, lightweight build, and excellent autofocus performance, especially on crop-sensor mirrorless cameras like the Canon R7 and Fujifilm bodies. A few questions about compatibility with specific cameras and features like weather sealing and aperture ring are noted, but the overall sentiment is extremely positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional image quality
  • Fast constant f/1.8 aperture
  • Compact internal zoom design
  • Lightweight build
  • Sharp and bright photos
Cons
  • No weather sealing mentioned
  • No manual aperture ring on some mounts
  • Compatibility questions with full-frame cameras
  • Expensive for some buyers
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Aperture 7
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Autofocus 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Compatibility 12

Scores

Portrait
Olympus
37
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Olympus
46
Sigma
89
Professional
Olympus
48
Sigma
89
Budget
Olympus
44
Sigma
87
Macro
Olympus
41
Sigma
82
Travel
Olympus
49
Sigma
81
Street
Olympus
54
Sigma
79
Landscape
Olympus
50
Sigma
79
Wildlife Sports
Olympus
40
Sigma
68

Specifications

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 12mmSigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min12 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max12 mm40 mm
Elements1117
Groups811
Aspherical Elements24★
ED Elements14★
CoatingZERO CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/1.8
Min Aperturef/2f/1.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades711★
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsFujifilm X
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.13 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread46 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMSCHLA (High-response Linear Actuator)
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm★280 mm
Max Magnification0.08x1:4.8★

Pros & Cons

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 12mm

  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (75th percentile)
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Strong user sentiment (66th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 12mm is CA$179 cheaper (1.2x less).

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 12mm0.046score per dollar
vs
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC0.077score per dollar

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC offers 1.7x better value for money

Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 12mm

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider