FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ
72 Overall Score
vs
Vivitar 4358W 58mm

Vivitar 4358W 58mm

Vivitar
40 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
FotoZ
87
Vivitar
20
Street
FotoZ
71
Vivitar
55
Budget
FotoZ
68
Vivitar
41
Travel
FotoZ
65
Vivitar
36
Portrait
FotoZ
61
Vivitar
50
Video Cinema
FotoZ
60
Vivitar
40
Landscape
FotoZ
59
Vivitar
28
Professional
FotoZ
55
Vivitar
37
Wildlife Sports
FotoZ
55
Vivitar
37

Specifications

FotoZ KZ-03 24mmVivitar 4358W 58mm
Optics
Typewide-anglewide-angle
Focal Length Min16 mm58 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm58 mm
Coatingnano-coatings—
Build
MountSony EM42
Weight0.12 kg★0.18 kg
Filter Thread41 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
Stabilization✓★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance16 mm★—
Max Magnification10X★—

Pros & Cons

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

  • Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (68th percentile)

Vivitar 4358W 58mm

  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Vivitar 4358W 58mm is CA$32 cheaper (2.1x less).

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.195score per dollar
vs
Vivitar 4358W 58mm1.376score per dollar

Vivitar 4358W 58mm offers 1.2x better value for money

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

Vivitar 4358W 58mm

Verdict

★ Winner: FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 10 specs.

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider