Nikon 20108
Nikon
40 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Panasonic
86 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Nikon 20108 | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | super-telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 800 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 800 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 22 | 17 |
| Groups | 14 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| Coating | Nano Crystal Coat, Fluorine Coat | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/6.3 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 2.39 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 5.00 m | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.25★ | 0.5x |
Pros & Cons
Nikon 20108
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (79th percentile)
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average build (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average macro (31st percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Pricing
Nikon 201080.005score per dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.086score per dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm offers 17.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
