Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

Sony
67 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

This wide-angle zoom lens receives high praise for its sharpness, lightweight design, and fast autofocus. Users find it excellent for landscape and astrophotography, with minimal distortion and solid build quality. One reviewer suggests a lower price would make it perfect, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Sharp across the frame
  • Lightweight design
  • Fast autofocus
  • Excellent for landscapes and astrophotography
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Price could be lower
👍 Sharpness 5
👍 Weight 4
👍 Autofocus speed 3
👍 Build quality 2
👍 Distortion 2
👍 Low light performance 2

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Budget
Sony
66
Tamron
97
Macro
Sony
58
Tamron
92
Landscape
Sony
74
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Sony
55
Tamron
85
Professional
Sony
66
Tamron
85
Street
Sony
58
Tamron
83
Portrait
Sony
46
Tamron
82
Video Cinema
Sony
56
Tamron
82
Travel
Sony
64
Tamron
81

Specifications

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max25 mm300 mm
Elements1620
Groups1313
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements3★2
CoatingFluorine coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance180 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification0.2x1:3.8★

Pros & Cons

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD is CA$530 cheaper (1.5x less).

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm0.044score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.103score per dollar

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD offers 2.3x better value for money

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider