Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

Sony
67 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

This wide-angle zoom lens receives high praise for its sharpness, lightweight design, and fast autofocus. Users find it excellent for landscape and astrophotography, with minimal distortion and solid build quality. One reviewer suggests a lower price would make it perfect, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Sharp across the frame
  • Lightweight design
  • Fast autofocus
  • Excellent for landscapes and astrophotography
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Price could be lower
👍 Sharpness 5
👍 Weight 4
👍 Autofocus speed 3
👍 Build quality 2
👍 Distortion 2
👍 Low light performance 2

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Professional
Sony
66
Nikon
89
Budget
Sony
66
Nikon
85
Street
Sony
58
Nikon
84
Macro
Sony
58
Nikon
84
Portrait
Sony
46
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Sony
56
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sony
74
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Sony
55
Nikon
73
Travel
Sony
64
Nikon
70

Specifications

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max25 mm28 mm
Elements1613
Groups1311
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements33
CoatingFluorine coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance180 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification0.2x1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm0.044score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.060score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.4x better value for money

Sony FE SEL1625G 16-25mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider