Canon L EF 17-40mm USM 40mm

Canon L EF 17-40mm USM 40mm

Canon
55 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Canon
47
Sigma
86
Street
Canon
54
Sigma
86
Macro
Canon
60
Sigma
82
Portrait
Canon
60
Sigma
81
Travel
Canon
35
Sigma
80
Budget
Canon
49
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Canon
45
Sigma
74
Landscape
Canon
36
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Canon
41
Sigma
66

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm USM 40mmSigma 207975
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min40 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm18 mm
Elements1213
Groups910
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
Min Aperturef/22f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
FormatFull-FrameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.50 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm117 mm
Max Magnification1:4.21:4

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm USM 40mm

  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Canon L EF 17-40mm USM 40mm0.065score per dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.093score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 1.4x better value for money

Canon L EF 17-40mm USM 40mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider