Dyson OnTrac 759557-01

Dyson OnTrac 759557-01

Dyson
62 Overall Score
vs
JBL Tune 670NC

JBL Tune 670NC

JBL
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Dyson OnTrac 759557-01

78 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Dyson OnTrac headphones receive generally positive feedback for their exceptional comfort, impressive sound quality, and effective noise cancellation. Users highlight the comfortable fit, especially for those with glasses or larger heads, and the clear, bass-heavy sound. However, the high price, lack of multipoint Bluetooth, limited EQ customization, and the heavy weight are common criticisms. The automatic play/pause sensor can be finicky for users with small ears.

Pros
  • Exceptional comfort for glasses wearers
  • Excellent sound quality with clear bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable for large heads
  • Good build quality
Cons
  • High price point
  • Heavy weight
  • No multipoint Bluetooth support
  • Limited EQ customization
  • Finicky automatic play/pause sensor
👍 Comfort 5
👍 Sound quality 5
👍 Noise cancellation 4
👎 Price 4
👎 Weight 3
👎 Bluetooth multipoint 2

JBL Tune 670NC

87 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

Most users love these JBL headphones, praising excellent sound quality, effective noise cancellation, comfortable fit, and long battery life—many report great value for the price. One reviewer had a defective unit with no sound in one ear. A few users appreciate the easy controls, foldable design, and app connectivity. Overall, sentiment is strongly positive with a minor quality control concern.

Pros
  • Excellent sound quality
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Long battery life
  • Comfortable fit
  • Great value for price
Cons
  • Potential defective unit (no sound in one ear)
  • No answers to Q&A questions
👍 Sound quality 5
👍 Noise cancellation 4
👍 Battery life 3
👍 Comfort 2
👍 Value for money 3
👎 Build quality 1

Scores

Budget
Dyson
60
JBL
90
Commute
Dyson
55
JBL
81
Gaming
Dyson
54
JBL
79
Work
Dyson
53
JBL
78
Music
Dyson
45
JBL
74
Studio
Dyson
32
JBL
71
Calls
Dyson
53
JBL
64

Specifications

Dyson OnTrac 759557-01JBL Tune 670NC
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable—✓★
Weight0.45 kg0.17 kg★
Ear Cushionmicrofibersoft ear cushions
HeadbandAluminumpadded headband
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size—32 mm★
Drivers—1★
Freq Min6 Hz★20 Hz
Freq Max21 kHz★20 kHz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—98 dB★
Max SPL—95 dB★
Hi-Res Audio✓★✗
Codecs—SBC, AAC, LC3
Noise Control
ANC✓✓
ANC Typeadaptiveadaptive
Transparency✓✓
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth—5.3★
Profiles—A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8
Multipoint✗✓★
Wired Connector—3.5mm
Detachable Cable—✓★
Cable Length—1.2192000150680542 m
Battery
Battery Life55 hrs70 hrs★
Charge Time3 hrs2 hrs★
Fast Charging10-minute charge delivers 2.5 hours of extra battery, 30-minute charge delivers 9 hours5min=3hrs
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Capacity—690 mAh★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count8★1
NC Mic✓✓
Boom Mic—✗
Features
Voice Assistanthold down for voice commandsvoice assistant
Touch Controls✓★✗
AppMyDyson appJBL Headphones
Gaming Mode✗✓★

Pros & Cons

Dyson OnTrac 759557-01

  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average comfort (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

JBL Tune 670NC

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile

Pricing

JBL Tune 670NC is CA$630 cheaper (10.0x less).

Dyson OnTrac 759557-010.088score per dollar
vs
JBL Tune 670NC1.305score per dollar

JBL Tune 670NC offers 14.8x better value for money

Dyson OnTrac 759557-01

JBL Tune 670NC

Verdict

★ Winner: JBL Tune 670NC

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 39 specs.

JBL Tune 670NC Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Also Consider